Last chance to comment on airport’s runway extension plan

airport southampton breeze through nov 19The public now has until January 3 January 16 to comment on Southampton Airport’s planning application to Eastleigh Borough Council (EBC), to extend its runway by 164 metres to the north and to create 600 new parking spaces.

l

 

Article continues after this message...

 

Although EBC, which declared a climate change and environmental emergency in July, is the planning authority, residents from Southampton can also comment via the application on Eastleigh’s website, which is here.

cllr steve leggett

In November Southampton City Council (SCC) declined to take a position against airport expansion ahead of the planning application being submitted, after a 1,900-signature petition secured a (brief) debate on the issue in the council chamber (pictured).

Councillors from both sides said they wanted more information before taking a view

The council did agree to consult residents before making its own response to Eastleigh’s planners, although time is now very short indeed: comments to Southampton City Council should be emailed to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with full name and postal address, quoting the reference 19/02021/CONSUL, according to a letter to residents received over the Christmas period from Bitterne Park councillors.

The deadline to make comments to SCC is December 31.

The airport says in its masterplan, which it now calls ‘A Vision For Sustainable Growth’, that: “A runway starter extension would allow larger narrow-body aircraft, such as the Airbus A319/A320 and Boeing 737-800 with 150-190 seats, to operate without major restrictions to a more distant and much wider route network from Southampton Airport, covering a range of European destinations.” (PDF page 14/document page 27).

Increases in passengers and air traffic forecast

The plan outlines a predicted increase in passengers from two million in 2017 to four million by 2027, and five million by 2037.

Air transport movements could increase from 39,300 in 2017 to 53,100 in 2027, and 57,800 by 2037 according to the plan, which also makes predictions about the airport’s economic and employment impact on the region.

why on earth expand airportsPressure group Airport Expansion Opposition Southampton (AXO) has published its own draft objection to the planning application on its website, which includes detailed points about “increased traffic”, noise, carbon dioxide emissions, economic ‘benefits’ and more.

And the group’s response to SCC begins: “Since almost all of the harm resulting from expansion is to be borne by residents of Southampton, mostly those living near the airport or under the flight path, we believe the City Council must scrutinise the economic case very closely to determine whether the benefits to the city are in proportion to the costs. We believe they are not.”

AXO’s detailed response to SCC is here.

Updated 10/1/20 with new deadline to comment on EBC application of January 16

We're not currently accepting new comments on this site

We're reader powered! Please help us keep publishing today...

Our local news is currently free to view, but not to produce. Join people just like you who already chip in to keep our site going by becoming a 'Good Friend' supporter for just £2.99 a month - or more if you can.

Use the subscribe button below using a debit or credit card securely via PayPal. You don't need a PayPal account - just use the "Pay with Debit or Credit Card' option, when you click the 'Subscribe' button below, on the next screen. There's no obligation to open a PayPal account. Or use your existing PayPal account if you prefer. Or even better, contact us to set up a standing order so we get all your sub rather than PayPal taking a percentage.

Click here for other options/to set up a standing order - and help us keep on keeping on.

It's appreciated!

Subcription Options

 

Alternatively make a one-off donation here - you don't need a PayPal account for this option either.